Standard
$60/ report
- All ASTM E1527-21 sections
- Firm template customization
- Full source citation
- 45-minute standard turnaround
- Email and Slack support
Source-traceable report drafting
Phase I reports in hours, not days.
Aster AI turns EDR packages, field observations, and firm standards into a cited ASTM E1527-21 draft for the senior Environmental Professional to review.
Built for small environmental consulting firms. The EP remains the final reviewer and certifying professional.
Phase I · Draft workspace
Drafting report
Historical use
Source evidence
Historical use narrative3 cites
Regulatory records4 cites
Site reconnaissance5 cites
REC rationale6 cites
EP review boundary
Draft complete. Professional opinions remain open for review.
Open review
Phase I · Draft workspace
Drafting report
Historical use
Source evidence
Historical use narrative3 cites
Regulatory records4 cites
Site reconnaissance5 cites
REC rationale6 cites
EP review boundary
Draft complete. Professional opinions remain open for review.
Open review
Phase I · Draft workspace
Drafting report
Historical use
Source evidence
Historical use narrative3 cites
Regulatory records4 cites
Site reconnaissance5 cites
REC rationale6 cites
EP review boundary
Draft complete. Professional opinions remain open for review.
Open review
The capacity constraint
Writing time limits the work your firm can accept.
A typical Phase I takes days of writing after the site visit and records review. Aster AI compresses the drafting window without changing the EP’s review responsibility.
Drafting progress
Historical use · Records review
24
Sources linked
11
Sections drafted
4
Review items
Unsupported claims are flagged, not filled in.
Source to draft
One defensible workflow from evidence to EP review.
The product lives inside the drafting window. Job intake, EDR ordering, the site visit, firm QA/QC, and client delivery remain in your existing workflow.
ASTM E1527-21 workflowReview boundary enforced
Source package
Upload supported EDR packages, field notes, photos, and interviews.
Evidence analysis
Aster AI maps source material into the ASTM report structure.
Draft generation
Narrative, tables, figures, findings, and citations are assembled.
EP review
You review every opinion, classification, exception, and conclusion.
What Aster AI produces
Every section, tied back to evidence.
Available evidence is structured into your firm’s report format. Source-based narrative is drafted; professional opinions and final classifications remain review items.
Executive summary
Drafted from available source material.
Site description
Drafted from available source material.
Records review
Drafted from available source material.
Historical use
Drafted from available source material.
Reconnaissance findings
Drafted from available source material.
Interviews summary
Drafted from available source material.
Findings and conclusions
Drafted from available source material.
RECs / HRECs / CRECs
Prepared for explicit EP review and determination.
Data gaps
Prepared for explicit EP review and determination.
Vapor screening
Prepared for explicit EP review and determination.
Recommendations
Prepared for explicit EP review and determination.
Signature and qualifications
Prepared for explicit EP review and determination.
Every factual statement is linked to its source. Unsupported claims surface as data gaps instead of plausible language.
You sign the report. Nothing changes about that.
Aster AI drafts. You review, edit, and certify. Every REC determination, professional opinion, and conclusion passes under your judgment before delivery.
The output is a draft—a very good draft—but it is a draft.
Your ASTM E1527-21 obligations remain unchanged. The system supports the work; it does not replace professional judgment.
Firm-specific output
It writes like your firm writes.
Upload three to five recent Phase I reports during onboarding. Aster AI captures the patterns your team already uses and applies them consistently to each new draft.
Structural preferences
Phrasing conventions
Formatting standards
Terminology
Boilerplate and disclaimers
Custom templates
Questions senior EPs ask
Skepticism is appropriate.
A drafting system should earn trust with traceability, explicit limits, and predictable exception handling.
How is this different from ChatGPT?
General-purpose language models do not parse EDR packages or structure work around ASTM E1527-21. Aster AI maps the actual source materials consultants use into a report workflow with citations, review states, and explicit gaps.
What about liability?
The EP signing the report remains responsible. Your review is the quality gate—the same role you hold today when a junior staff member drafts a section for you.
Can I trust the output?
Every factual claim is cited to the underlying package or uploaded material. Every REC analysis includes a rationale. Unsupported claims surface as review items or data gaps.
What if my site is unusual?
Sparse records, conflicting historical uses, unclear tank status, incomplete interviews, and other exceptions are surfaced for EP judgment rather than smoothed into unsupported narrative.
Pricing
Simple per-report pricing.
No charge for parsing supported EDR packages, revisions, template updates, onboarding, training, or future ASTM standard updates.
At the Standard rate, drafting costs less than one-sixth of a typical $375 EDR package. Any savings claim should still be validated against your firm’s actual workflow.
Firm plan
$199/ month + $50/report
- Everything in Standard
- Priority turnaround under 30 minutes
- Dedicated support channel
- Multi-user firm workspace
- Volume pricing at 20+ reports/month
See the workflow on a real site
Book a 30-minute demo.
Bring an EDR package for a site of your choosing. We’ll walk through the draft, citations, review boundary, and your firm’s edge cases.
No sales pressure. Two professionals talking about Phase I workflow.